Into the Wild of Freedom

Anna Smith
By | November 23, 2014

Ethika Politika needs $25,000 to continue publishing through the first half of 2016. Please make a tax-deductible donation today.

“He was unheeded, happy, and near to the wild heart of life. He was alone and young and willful and wildhearted, alone amid a waste of wild air and brackish waters and the seaharvest of shells and tangle and veiled grey sunlight.”

Unheeded, happy, alone, young, willful, and wildhearted—this description of Christopher McCandless, in the biographical novel-turned-movie Into the Wild, sums up a vision of freedom that has haunted me like a siren’s song. I watched the movie for the first time during a study abroad semester in Austria and heard in McCandless’s story the echo of that unrelenting call to freedom. Into the Wild is the story of an intellectual, disillusioned, and idealistic young man who graduates from law school, donates all his money to charity, and sets out “into the wild” in an old yellow Datsun. He is a pilgrim in search of “the experiences, the memories, the great triumphant joy of living to the fullest extent in which real meaning is found.” Watching the movie, I was caught up in his wonder at beauty, his willingness to take magnificent risks, his desire for truth, his love of nature, and, most of all, I was mesmerized by his whole-hearted, fearless embrace of freedom. I watched with jealous admiration as his quest drew him all the way from Georgia across the country and up to Alaska, where he lived entirely alone, testing his ability to survive in the glorious wilderness.

Experiencing new people and places, establishing my independence, and testing my limits: These were tantalizing longings that I wished I had the courage to embrace with the whole-heartedness of a McCandless. Throughout my semester abroad, I fell into bouts of sadness and anxiety because I lacked the courage to go a little further, see a little more, and break a bit freer from my friends and family. I was frustrated with slow traveling companions, having to adapt my plans for others, and my own physical exhaustion and responsibilities. Watching the movie, I felt that McCandless not only understood my restless need for freedom but also had the courage to achieve it—the courage I desperately desired. But as the movie reached its denouement, my heart sank. Christopher McCandless died of starvation, huddled inside his sleeping bag, alone in an abandoned school bus near Mt. McKinley.

I was shocked. This was not the ending that I wanted. Endless freedom, an open road, and the beauty of life shrunk into an emaciated corpse in a sleeping bag. I needed to know more of the story, so I read the biography and found that McCandless’s saga was not just the fruit of an idealist, adventurous spirit. He had come from a family built on secrecy and lies—corruption that deeply frustrated his idealistic nature. His solution was to seek truth far from the constraints and the corruptions of a society and family that had let him down. Tragically, McCandless left behind his parents and his adoring little sister who together received the incomprehensible tidings that their missing boy was found dead in Alaska. The pursuit of ultimate freedom had robbed the McCandless family of a beloved son and brother.

Mercifully, there is more to McCandless’s end than silent starvation. Right before he died, the 24-year-old underlined a passage from Tolstoy’s Family Happiness that reads, “He was right in saying that the only certain happiness in life is to live for others …” A scribbled note on his copy of Dr. Zhivago provides a last ray of hope: “And so it turned out that only a life similar to the life of those around us, merging with it without a ripple, is genuine life, and that an unshared happiness is not happiness …”

The scales fell from my eyes and I realized how deeply I had believed in McCandless’s dream. And I also realized that it was just that: a dream, and not one that I truly wanted. In his final days of starvation and impending death, McCandless realized that freedom does not consist in the gifts of nature, of numerous exciting experiences, and even of the hard-won truths learned through self-reliance and stepping outside of one’s comfort zone. There will always be another mountain to climb and another constraint to shed, but unless we share these experiences with others, their meaning is lost:  “An unshared happiness is not happiness.”

Whatever the particular siren melody is, we each face a temptation to look at our human responsibilities and relationships as fetters that prevent us from reaching full happiness. It’s the mother imagining that she’d be a saint, if only she lived a life apart in a convent, far away from the anxiety of family life. It’s the professor who knows he cannot teach to his full potential with a class of ill-prepared, lazy freshmen.  It’s me thinking that without God and the demands that He sometimes puts on me, I’d be free to be myself. It’s a lie.

In The Heart Dietrich von Hildebrand explains that “what matters … is to grasp the contrast between the divine unlimitedness and that natural excessiveness worshipped by the Promethean type of man who attempts to surpass the limits of his creaturehood.” There is emptiness in being “in love with boundlessness for its own sake” (95). I do not accuse McCandless but I do accuse myself of falling in love with “boundlessness for its own sake.” This desire to achieve some ideal of freedom always ends in crushing disappointment. I am frequently let down by myself, by others, and by experiences, not because I or they are inadequate, but because, as Hildebrand explains, “every attempt to attain unlimitedness on the natural level—that is to say, by our own nature, is doomed to failure” (96).

So every time my Promethean urge—my pride—gets the better of me, I strive with dissatisfaction for something “better” than what I have, the people I am with, or even who I am. Daily, I trek out to my own “Alaskan wilderness” to prove that I can survive and even thrive on my own. But like McCandless, I find that this pursuit is disappointing and ends in icy loneliness. When I seek myself, my self is all I can ever hope to find.

I still desire freedom. I desire a freedom that is deeper, greater, and more costly than the pursuits that pull me to unknown lands and adventures. And it is all the more real. I desire the freedom that allows me to pour myself out completely, to be empty to receive others. It is a different young man who shows me this kind of freedom. He, like McCandless, is unusual, unconventional, and inspirational. He too cares about truth, about beauty, about goodness. He too is burdened by the corruption of society. He too dies a tragic and early death.  In his death, he does not abandon his friends and family, but rather draws them closer together. His mother and best friend are right by his side in his last moments, drawing a small bit measure of comfort from being able to share in his suffering. He doesn’t scrawl out a last note about “merging” his life with others. He writes in blood on the wood of a cross as his life is completely poured out for others. With his final breath he breathes, “Father, into Thy hands I commend my spirit.”

Jesus Christ’s act of love, which Hildebrand describes as “the supreme donation of his human existence to his heavenly Father, the ultimate expression of absolute surrender, shelteredness, and peace,” is true fearlessness. It is real magnificence. It is total giving from a heart of absolute freedom. God grant me a taste of such a free love—that is freedom that I want!

Readers are invited to discuss essays in argumentative and fraternal charity, and are asked to help build up the community of thought and pursuit of truth that Ethika Politika strives to accomplish, which includes correction when necessary. The editors reserve the right to remove comments that do not meet these criteria and/or do not pertain to the subject of the essay.

  • lyle

    fail to follow the comparison to this and Jesus, in Jesus was obedient to his parents, honor thy father and mother. their is a huge difference to false freedom that we seek today, that is spoken of here, and true freedom of acceptance to our obligation of love without boundrys to others, denial of our own wants… Jesus picked up his cross rather than deny his father, this person threw down his cross and walked off..as about most all do today..

  • MAO

    Even Christ went off by himself to walk in the desert or in the Garden of Gethsemane. It’s not the going away to be by yourself that’s the problem…you just have to remember to come back. Life requires balance not the extremes.

  • http://forwantofwonder.wordpress.com Nicole

    The comparison here is one of contrast: while both shared similar characteristics and desires, they fulfilled them completely differently. The author points out that, as you said, only by picking up one’s cross and living for others can one find fulfillment, not in the ultimately self-centered pursuit of striking out onto the wild alone.

  • Tom

    Great article. I think you were right on target in your analysis of the movie and book, Into the Wild. The key line is that unshared happiness is not happiness. So many people who watch that movie want to emulate McCandless’ trek to Alaska in their own way but most of them miss the point which was his last line indicated above. Sad he had to learn it that way and that so many others follow the same path. Our hearts are restless until they rest ith God.