New Seeds of Revolution

Hunter Sharpless
By | January 26, 2015

Ethika Politika needs $25,000 to continue publishing through the first half of 2016. Please make a tax-deductible donation today.

According to a study by Oxfam, the 80 richest individuals in the world wield the same amount of wealth as the poorest 3.6 billion. At home, income inequality worsens. Wages are stagnant for the worker. Candidates for both the Republicans and Democrats are well aware of this, and are positioning themselves accordingly for a 2016 run. Over the last several years the country has seen organized anger aimed toward Wall Street. The deaths of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, and Eric Garner—to name just a few—have sparked protests over racial prejudice and police brutality. Millions of women and children are hungry in the United States and worldwide, despite a global infrastructure capable of producing more goods than ever before. In France it’s je suis Charlie. In Baga, Nigeria, Boko Haram dropped two thousand dead.

In other words, indiscriminate injustice thrives in this world. A post-Enlightenment, scientifically knowledgeable, technologically astounding race of human beings has done nothing to stymie oppression, greed, and prejudice. Citing facts and articles and statistics seems banal in some way. I probably don’t need any of that to convince the reader of the harshness of this life.

Are the seeds of a revolution being sown? At here in the United States or worldwide? Actor Donald Sutherland—who stars in the Hunger Games series—tells the Guardian that he hopes so. Maybe the success of the series in which he stars means that his ideas aren’t just the lost thoughts of an old man. Maybe the protests, the anger, and the cries for justice signal that his anticipation is well-founded. So the question: Is there a revolution coming? What kind? On what scale? Against which authorities? (Are the authorities too strong?) And is revolution the best way to fight injustice?

Believe it or not, these same injustices and inequalities existed 2,000 years ago. Despite some attempts to paint the Roman Empire in a retroactive whitewashed light, the ancient world’s preeminent power freely exercised its brutality domestically and abroad. Material greed in Rome’s elite drove rampant corruption. Heavy taxation and military occupation upheld the venerable Pax Romana—and despite its palatable name, the Pax Romana ran the way that it did not out of the kindness out of the emperor’s heart, but because it was simply a more efficient way to rule, extort, and exploit. Imperial worship cast the emperor in a falsified divine light. And if you thought Rome’s conquests entailed entirely peaceful assimilations, read about the triumphs of emperors and generals, triumphs in which mass executions of foreigners were the most beloved events of the citizens.

Any evil alive today existed in Rome yesterday, yet Christ did not once call for a revolution of arms. Instead, he said to pay your taxes—to the occupying empire. John the Baptist, too, preached no revolution.

Tax collectors also came to be baptized and said to him, “Teacher, what shall we do?” And he said to them, “Collect no more than you are authorized to do.” Soldiers also asked him, “And we, what shall we do?” And he said to them, “Do not extort money from anyone by threats or by false accusation, and be content with your wages” (Luke 3:12-14).

Not only did John the Baptist not incite the people to an insurrection, he didn’t encourage tax collectors—i.e., collaborators with the occupying force—or even the soldiers of Rome to quit their jobs.

The Bible is a story about God, but it is also a story about man. The Bible, despite its many commandments and creeds, is about interior transformation. From the Ten Commandments—“thou shall not covet”—to Jeremiah—“the heart is deceitful above all things; and desperately sick”—to the Psalms—“I shall not want”—to the Sermon on the Mount—“blessed are the pure in heart”—the message is the definition, diagnosis, and transformation of the interior self.

I think that to be radical is to reign in one’s own soul—to admit that the oppression, greed, and prejudice that steep this world in evil fester in one’s own heart. The same motivations that drive dictators to oppress their people live in me. I am guilty of being greedy, of heaping up silly treasures in my house. A new watch, or some fancy socks, or a pair of Italian loafers. I own more than I need. In my mind I know how superfluous these things are, yet still I crave them. I am guilty of using power or position to manipulate, to subjugate others, however small my ways. I am guilty of being a bully. And I am guilty of prejudice, very guilty. In fact I judge almost every moment; I assess harshly; I like to be right; I like to win; and I like when others are wrong next to my own rightness.

I believe that the injustice of the world finds its birth in the individual human heart—in my individual human heart—not in systems or powers external to me. If what Christ taught is true—if the disease of man that fosters injustice is an interior, spiritual problem—then we will not win with revolution; we will fail to conquer evil, even a little. Goodness begins with interior transformation. Goodness begins with the discovery of the true self—the secret self hidden in the mystery of Christ.

In Luke 5, Christ heals a paralytic whose friends lower him through the roof of a house in which Christ is preaching.

When he saw their faith, he said, “Man, your sins are forgiven you.” And the scribes and the Pharisees began to question, saying, “Who is this who speaks blasphemies? Who can forgive sins but God alone?” When Jesus perceived their thoughts, he answered them, “Why do you question in your hearts? Which is easier, to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven you,’ or to say, ‘Rise and walk’? But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins”—he said to the man who was paralyzed, “I say to you, rise, pick up your bed and go home.”

Christ healed the man’s spiritual disease first, the man’s physical disease second. And so it is throughout his ministry, for to be a Christian is to be a person who undergoes an interior, spiritual revolution thanks to the grace and love of God. This is radical love, radical change. This is the divine, pure love that shapes the individual into someone capable of changing the world.

Readers are invited to discuss essays in argumentative and fraternal charity, and are asked to help build up the community of thought and pursuit of truth that Ethika Politika strives to accomplish, which includes correction when necessary. The editors reserve the right to remove comments that do not meet these criteria and/or do not pertain to the subject of the essay.

  • http://www.unmuseum.org/philex.htm DE-173

    “Millions of women and children are hungry in the United States and worldwide, despite a global infrastructure capable of producing more goods than ever before. ”

    Would you mind producing an objective statistic supporting this contention?

  • JGradGus

    I hesitate to respond for the author, but I will say that my Parish is currently providing food to 26 families within its boundaries through our Parish food bank. Also FeedingAmerica.org may have some of the statistics you are looking for, at least for the U.S.

  • JGradGus

    Nicely said Mr. Sharpless. I do however take issue with your statement, “A post-Enlightenment, scientifically knowledgeable, technologically astounding race of human beings has done nothing to stymie oppression, greed, and prejudice.” We (the human race) have fought a number of wars since the Enlightenment to stymie oppression. The U.S. has also fought a Civil War over prejudice, and has since then passed numerous laws aimed at trying to eliminate it. Greed, however, is a tough nut to crack. While I would bet most people in the world would agree that greed is wrong/sinful, I would also bet that if you asked 25 people “how much is too much?” you’d get 25 different answers.

  • http://www.unmuseum.org/philex.htm DE-173

    1.) 26 families receiving food in your Parish is not an objective statistic “supporting this contention”.
    2.) The organization you cited is encouraging lobbying on behalf of an agenda is and is not objective.

  • Daniel Schwindt

    I’m not sure many historians would still buy the “Civil War as a war against prejudice” interpretation. And if it was a war to end slavery, then it only proves that it took America an unprecedented degree of barbarism to exorcise racism. European countries did the same thing, at about the same time, without laying waste to themselves in the process.

  • Aaron Taylor

    Absolutely agree about the problematics of violent revolution for Christians. That’s why many bishops refused to give Holy Communion to the “patriots” in the 1770s, and even the much-ballyhooed Archbishop Carroll died an unrepentant excommunicate.

  • LawProf61

    It is an excellent piece. I would take issue with one glaring omission: the same evils at the root of “systemic” oppression are often at the heart of *individual* decisions that produce great misery. In a free society, those are at least as much a cause of human suffering as are inequitable systems.

  • Jason Oakes

    This is an excellent article. Re: Many of the comments,

  • NDaniels

    The injustice of the world finds its birth in the human heart, but this does not change the fact that there are systems or powers external to us that desire to lead us into temptation and deliver us into the hands of evil.
    Human Life is Sacred, and because it is Sacred we must protect Human Life from those who desire to do us harm.
    To be a Christian, is to desire to “undergo an interior, spiritual revolution thanks to the Grace and Love of God”. Salvational Love, however, is both individual and relational, which is how we can know that the sin of the scribes and Pharisees, was desiring Salvation for themselves, but not for others.
    Ecumenism that does not desire to bring others to Christ, is a false ecumenism.

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    Thank you, surely that war should be more clearly viewed, as a major victory not for the Union, but for Satan.

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    Thank you. The revolution is being led by Francis, and it is one of opening hearts one by one to the Holy Spirit. It is a revolution of passivity to evil, of turning away from ambitious, narcissistic endeavors including exacting of worldly justice, and toward faith, family, community, life.

  • NDaniels

    Actually, Thomas, The Sacrifice of The Cross, Is The Sacrifice of The Most Holy, The Blessed Trinity. From the moment of creation, we have been created in The Image and Likeness of God, equal in Dignity, while being complementary as a son or daughter, Willed by God, worthy of Redemption. Apart from God, there is no Justice.

    “Man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes forth from the word of God.” – Jesus The Christ

    “Who am I to Judge”, in regards to a disordered inclination, including a disordered sexual inclination, is the cry of those who, like the scribes and Pharisees, do not desire we overcome our disordered inclinations, and become transformed through Salvational Love, God’s Gift of Grace and Mercy.

    Here is what The Prayer says:

    “…and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen”.

    Love requires desiring Salvation for one’s beloved.

    “I Give to you a New Commandment, Love one another as I Have Loved you.” – Jesus The Christ

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    True, however one should not infer that our Holy Father, by averring final judgment to God, does not love the many he seeks to save. As our leader in service to our Lord, he does not cease his search for the Way and the Light, and neither should we.

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    At the same time, I believe Francis takes to heart the critiques, and we shall hear more weighting of his words toward repentance.

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    JGG!… You are correct but wars and greed are not among the silver linings in modernity. Mother Teresa, John Paul II, Gandhi, are the start of the list of whom we should admire.

  • NDaniels

    Then why does he support same-sex sexual unions, as long as they are “private”, do not include children, and are not called marriage, and thus, according to Francis, do not affect Society? Does he not consider those involve in same-sex sexual relationships members of Society, or perhaps does he believe man to be an end in himself, when from The Beginning man was created for communion with God?
    (See page 117 of the book On Heaven and Earth)

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    The quantification of everything for analysis and reconstitution, is part of Satan’s plan. Isn’t the citation that 80 extended families hold the wealth of the bottom 3.6 billion, enough evidence of structural failure? Why not attack that?

    No sir, let us become human again, and accept one another’s anecdotes.

  • NDaniels

    At this hour it is late.

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    I think the way to understand, is that he accepts, not supports. He gives the “tough love” to Catholics who he feels should know better, that is certain. However I do not feel he is abandoning anyone, only just quickly “planting seeds” sometimes, and it can seem hard. There is much work to do.

  • Thomas Storck

    Surely, though, short of revolution (which is almost always wrong – including in 1775 in the U.S.), some structures are better than others and some make justice easier and some harder. To take an example that I suspect conservatives will agree with, no fault divorce makes divorce easier and makes it easier to abandon one’s spouse. Obviously the law does not create lust or greed or irresponsibility, but it facilitates their external effects. Laws and structures do matter, even though evil obviously arose originally in the will – first of Lucifer, then of Adam and Eve.

  • JGradGus

    The number of families receiving food from my parish’s food bank was not intended
    to by an objective statistic, merely supporting anecdotal information. However if there are 26 families in my parish (a fairly well off one) it’s a good bet that the 17,600+ parishes in this country are supporting at least a half million families.

    Also, I had a feeling you were not going to accept the FeedingAmerica number but I
    threw it out to see how you would respond.
    I would bet you would also not accept a UN stat that says there are 805 million undernourished people in the world, and Heritage.org does not publish any numbers on hunger in America, so that leaves StatisticBrain.com which reports that 11% of U.S. households are at risk of hunger and 800 million people in the world suffer from hunger and malnutrition.

  • JGradGus

    Amen to that . . . but let’s add Francis to the list!

  • JGradGus

    States’ Rights and North / South differences were the primary causes but slavery was the catalyst. The abolitionist movement had been fueling the fire since 1830 and even many of the Founding Fathers knew that slavery would be a problem down the road. Europe’s economy was not nearly as dependent on slavery as the South’s was. I’m still trying to understand how your comment, “. . .it only proves that it took America an unprecedented degree of barbarism to exorcise racism” fits into this. Chances are that the abolitionist movement, increased awareness of the inhumanity of slavery and advances in technology would have eventually brought an end to slavery without a war.

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    I am hopeful that he will cut to front of the line. Hard to beat JPII though, for pure, radiant love.

  • NDaniels
  • http://www.unmuseum.org/philex.htm DE-173

    I asked for an objective statistic and “at risk” is not the same as actual hunger. If you are going to interject on behalf of another, please answer the question.

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    Thank you… Certainly Francis was giving more than administrative reference to these issues. Just as surely, in his heart he does not desire to compromise all of them! Anyway, that is not a very good “Secret”-ary, to have. (Personally, I am disappointed to see him persist with the transgender meeting… perhaps intended as example to pastors? If you plant too many seeds next to one another, none will grow, as I think he will start to see at this point. Lack of energy is not his fault, perhaps only an excess of ambition!)

  • JGradGus

    If “800 million suffer from hunger and malnutrition” is not the same as “actual hunger” you have a comprehension problem.

  • JGradGus

    I can’t believe Francis’s “Who am I to Judge?” question is still being taken out of context! He was responding to a specific situation. Francis said that if a homosexual man is trying to live a chaste, Catholic life, he should not be judged on the basis of his temptations, but rather on his character. That is not an approval of homosexuality.

  • JGradGus
  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    Hah!.. And I thought I was radical calling Civil War a victory not for Union, but for Satan!

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    Thank you, I like it… Yes I think it is good way of looking at him… Argentina is not so much Third World, but many in West will believe in God while thinking of Satan as old wives tale. But where God is removed, Satan steps in.

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    JGG, that quote was because of a Church official who was accused of financial impropriety. But yes, Francis would agree with your summation, that is what he asks, that we forgive and guide the lost, we should not abandon them. The biggest trouble with succumbing to temptations is not the satisfaction in itself, but that the unnatural acts and satisfaction of same necessarily remove a person from any service to God..

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    Dr. Storck, as an improvement over earlier idea, I found the following prescient quote on delumens.org… again looking to referring to revered Americans instead of Chesterton, and this is John Adams (who is far superior to last person I recommended e.g. WJ Bryant):

    “While our country remains untainted with the principles and manners which are now producing desolation in so many parts of the world; while she continues sincere, and incapable of insidious and impious policy, we shall have the strongest reason to rejoice in the local destination assigned us by Providence. But should the people of America once become capable of that deep simulation towards one another, and towards foreign nations, which assumes the language of justice and moderation, while it is practising iniquity and extravagance, and displays in the most captivating manner the charming pictures of candour, frankness, and sincerity, while it is rioting in rapine and insolence, this country will be the most miserable habitation in the world. Because we have no government, armed with power, capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

    —John Adams, 11 October 1798

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    Yeah, how ridiculous. A guy doesn’t want merely anecdote, so what does he believe? Only the fact that he does not see hunger in his neighborhood, That is less than anecdote, that is only believing one’s own insulated experience!

  • NDaniels

    Identifying someone according to sexual desire/orientation, sexually objectifies the human person, and is thus a violation of God’s Commandment regarding lust and the sin of adultery. God desires that we desire to overcome our disordered inclinations so that we are not led into temptation, but become transformed through Salvational Love, God’s Gift of Grace and Mercy.

    http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2012/december/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20121221_auguri-curia_en.html

    See paragraph 6

  • Thomas Storck

    “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

    Prescinding from the question whether Americans in 1798 were especially moral or religious, by what right did Adams think that we had any more reason to be or remain moral or religious any more than any other people in the world? We didn’t even have the true Faith, for the most part, Catholics were a small minority at the time.

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    Well, I said it was prescient, not necessarily accurate. And to any American of any faith, it is relevant.

    We aren’t going to change the whole mess in one sitdown, that’s for sure. Like Francis, I will settle for introducing people to Jesus, then we can get on with the details!