park-bench-reading

Editorial

Solidarity Begins In Sympathy

Mattias A. Caro
By | April 27, 2015

April was particularly a “not fun” month in terms of finances. We had to pay a fair amount in taxes. My son was born, and that was a great blessing, but thanks to the generosity of my health plan, his birth left us with four to five thousands dollars worth of out-of-pocket medical expenses (including some really questionable line-items on the hospital bill). My deductible year rolled over in March.

Fun! And next month, our mortgage goes up thanks to an increase in property taxes. Unfortunately, our income has dropped over the last year as I’ve changed jobs; both changes make refinancing and gaining better repayment terms on home and student loans simply out of the question, even though I have great credit and never carry a balance. My working days and commitments are much heavier than others’, with a return that doesn’t seem to be enough.

I’m blessed to be able to work several jobs from the comfort of my home desk and thus to find supplementary sources of income. I don’t mind the hard work and long days. I figure I still have it better than a farmer, who can’t take a morning off if he’s under the weather. I have it better than a lot of people. One of the things I can do is pursue my vocation, and a lot of people can’t. I get to do work that I enjoy and think valuable. Because I am a person of faith, that fearful pursuit of my vocation is rewarding. And I am not afraid, because I have trust in God that if I am discerning and prudent, my needs will be taken care of.

My friends listen closely, but the best advice they often give is, “Well, just get a higher paying job.” I say the same thing to myself quite often. Sure. I could. I’m a licensed attorney, so I could make bank somewhere. But I also went through a lengthy discernment process last year, realizing that my gifts and talents were really meant for the field of education. (Also, practicing law was making me sick with anxiety.) I always knew that my transition from law to another career, née vocation, meant a certain change in lifestyle and income. But it feels like financially the game is rigged against me.

A new job or new direction is not the right solution. It isn’t even the easy solution. I want to sense that these problems facing my family are not our cross alone to carry. Yes, of course, as a Catholic, I have a spiritual view of my particular difficulties that prayerfully are united to the sufferings of Christ. After all in scripture He never promised us an easy life. But in the same manner in which I can spiritually unite these sufferings to Christ, I want to be united to my brothers and sisters in Christ materially. I want to feel that they help me carry my crosses as I want to help them.

Nevertheless, I am concerned at how alone I feel in this pursuit. The responsibility to solve these issues is, of course, mine alone, but I do expect others to walk with me, listening, supporting, thinking, and in those ways helping to lighten the burden. That seems a necessary first step in solidarity.

What I want from others isn’t financial help but sympathy. Sympathy is part of solidarity, a disposition that draws us together with our fellow human beings. Within the context of faith, solidarity works to help us help each other to walk step-by-step closer in our common calling toward God. We all have needs and problems that the common efforts of our daily work are insufficient to solve, and we all have gifts, of talents and time, that we can offer to help others in their needs, in a way that shouldn’t be channeled just through the skills and services we sell in the markets.

At a secular level we see examples of solidarity in food drives at Thanksgiving time or the local Habitat for Humanity. New mothers might join a nursing group formed by the local chapter of La Leche League. Families might join a farmers co-op where in exchange for some small help they get a bushel of vegetables each week. We say that these are examples of little associations that make life more livable and “a bit more human.” That’s a funny phrase because it implies that our solitude or remaining alone in need is something inhuman.

Pope Pius XII spoke of the great need for a “law of human solidarity and charity, dictated and imposed by our common origin.” He saw it as a law that is “sealed by the sacrifice of redemption offered by Jesus Christ.” If then there is this law, there must be a way to follow it in daily life. Law without an incarnation in daily human habits and without a model in the imagination remains an abstract ideal. The Portuguese politician José Manuel Barroso explains, “There is no stability without solidarity and no solidarity without stability.”

The Catholic conversation on solidarity generally begins and ends in political economy. The chattering Catholic classes of the left and the right talk about solidarity either in terms of the “preferential option for the poor” or the importance of freedom and free markets for the thriving of society. Both conversations are necessary and important. But they limit an understanding of our call to live in solidarity with others to structurally addressing problems.

I don’t want the easy fix of a little more money or of someone else taking responsibility for my problems. That’s not solidarity. The problems we all face in everyday life are not just our solitary problems. We have to help each other. And that help has to be real. “No man is an island unto himself.” We need to develop a sense of solidarity as something lived in our ordinary, daily lives. We can start with sympathy, the imaginative opening of our hearts to the problems of others.

This sympathy requires humility on my part. It is not easy admitting or asking for help. This is especially true when despite hard work, things don’t always add up. Perhaps I have a (misplaced) sense of guilt that I ought to do more or that I just need to accept the consequences of my limits; in short, that my problems are mine and mine alone. But then, if that were the case, I would be missing in my life very much those opportunities to “love one another.”

This sympathy then becomes the necessary first step to overcome a solitude we find when faced with difficulties. Sympathy means that others will listen and, when they can, offer help. In the longer run it should turn toward conversations about concrete actions, associations, and changes we can pursue to make sure that for myself and for others difficulties are not confronted alone. We rarely discuss solidarity at this level, at the level of action in our everyday lives. It seems that by taking the necessary first step of sympathetic listening to others, we might initiate a necessary change in our charity toward one another.

Print Friendly
  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    You have more than my sympathy Mr. Caro, you have my empathy. Unfortunately our society has fashioned a system that places work at the center of life, and places a high bar of “incentive”, e.g. threat of dissolution, if you wander from the sanctioned tasks e.g. the “highest bidders”. As you can see, misery loves company!

    Inevitably on a quest informed by our Lord, the solidarity you will feel is not with those you haltingly commiserate now, but with those who work selflessly for long hours at meager tasks in service of paying bills foisted onto them by powers above, the people riding buses up and down from city to suburb, the faceless and nameless lambs of God.

  • JGradGus

    You really can’t talk about solidarity without talking about subsidiarity – they go hand in hand. But as society becomes more secular and the more power we grant to the power-hungry, greedy loons in Washington D.C., it’s a sure bet that subsidiarity will lose all meaning and solidarity will be re-defined. The secular progressives are re-engineering society. We are marching toward Utopia where moral truth will be replaced by moral relativism and we’ll all be singing ‘Kumbaya.’

  • http://www.ethikapolitika.org Mattias A Caro

    Sure. That might be the case. But we’ve spent too long locating solidarity and subsidiarity in the macro, political and economic sense. My point is that we need to recover solidarity as something in everyday life that we don’t need to be empowered to do.

  • http://www.ethikapolitika.org Mattias A Caro

    Thank you for the reassurance of prayers. Nothing in the spiritual Fathers of the Church would suggest that silence in suffering is a necessary precondition for grace from that suffering. I’ve actually gone to pains to write in such a manner that precludes discussing what in secret I say to my heavenly Father. The keeping suffering secret in the manner you suggest is more a virtue of American rugged individualism than it is of Christian ethic.

    God Bless you for your family!

  • http://www.ethikapolitika.org Mattias A Caro

    Indeed. But that does not preclude a necessary space in the public sphere—even if is the sphere of my own life and the lives that touch me—to know about their problems and perhaps, taking that first step in hearing about them, to try to do something about them.

  • Jane

    Prudent sharing of your situation is important. An archbishop blessed me and several of my children recently. I said nothing to him, aside from telling him how many kids I had as I presented myself for a blessing. After he blessed me he said, “I am the oldest of 15. I know your life.” I drew many graces from that shepherd’s association with the reality of what my life entails. I have several close associates, similar to Christ’s friendships with Peter, James and John, (if you will). Therefore, I am not talking about rugged individualism, just prudent sharing of your cross. There was only one Simon the Cynrenian, after all.

    Of course the corporal and spiritual works of mercy always should inform the Christian. And The Visitation always plays in my mind. Also, Mary noticed the wine running short at Cana. Nobody whined (punned intended) to her:)

  • JGradGus

    Yes, I understand your point. My point is that solidarity cannot be recovered because it has been separated from subsidiarity. We (Catholics and Christians) did not consciously do this, but we did allow it to happen. The clergy is complicit through their failure to preach moral truth, instruct the faithful in what true social justice is, and uphold doctrine (all in a futile attempt to keep the pews full), even though a number of Popes warned us about the threats posed by moral relativism and individualism.
    Big Government is now in charge of everything and self help, families, and local communities taking care of their own is viewed as fruitless. Solidarity has been replaced with individualism and society is all about being individuals and accepting and celebrating diversity and moral relativism. Solidarity is only meaningful today as a rallying cry for labor unions against greedy corporations.

  • http://newarkistheplace.com/ Thomas Mullally

    Yes, the listening can be hard to do when what we hear is ruining our pre-conceptions, and especially when we realize the person is someone we can help in a concrete way, if we would make an exception to our tidy little world! You are definitely on the right path, Mr. Caro.

  • http://www.ethikapolitika.org Mattias A Caro

    Solidarity and subsidiarity certainly work with each other. However, without some recovery of responsibility for one another in our everyday life we have little chance of actually pushing for a greater role for subsidiarity. Solidarity doesn’t work today because people decide that they’d rather not be bothered.

  • JGradGus

    When you say we need “recovery of responsibility for one another” you are talking about subsidiarity, not solidarity. Subsidiarity is caring for and helping one another at the most basic level – family, neighbors, the local community. Solidarity is people coming together for a common cause.

  • http://www.ethikapolitika.org Mattias A Caro

    Huh? Solidarity is a fruit of charity. Charity is borne out of love for one another. Not sure the hair you are trying to split.

  • JGradGus

    As is Subsidiarity, but you are confusing the two. As you say “We have to help each other.” That is Subsidiarity. Solidarity and stability come about once we recognize that charity does begin at home (subsidiarity). That ‘we are all in this together’ (solidarity) will grow from a recognition that helping one another is the key. Your “misplaced sense of guilt” has likely been brought on by listening to the liberals/progressives and their mantra that government is the answer to our problems.

  • http://www.ethikapolitika.org Mattias A Caro

    I never mentioned guilt in the context of government action. In fact, no where in this article did I even bring up government or politics. It’s a sign of marxism the need to reduce all social and personal problems down to political problems. But let’s talk about Marx some other day, shall we?

  • JGradGus

    You are bringing up Marx, not me. I brought up ‘government’ twice in regard to the secular progressive vision for what they want the USA to become and you did not comment. I brought it up a third time only to make a point: the emotional arguments being made by the secular progressives are having the desired effect — they are making many good people feel guilty for having what some others do not. Which brings me back to my original point: Secular Progressives are pushing subsidiarity and solidarity (and other Judeo-Christian values) to the wayside in an attempt to re-engineer society. Forget Marxism. The new vision for Utopia is Social Democracy.

  • http://www.ethikapolitika.org Mattias A Caro

    When everything is reducible to the political order, we are essentially playing in Marx’s sandbox.

  • JGradGus

    And so on that platitude the conversation ends.